These could ultimately just be growing pains that will subside as the Thunderbolt 3/USB-C standard gets adopted, but going all-in while so few devices use this standard is really annoying. How many filmmakers are going to try to show a project they’re working on a projector and will have to ask whether anyone has a dongle so they can connect to HDMI? How many photographers are going to be stuck without access to a compatible card reader now that the MacBook Pro has ditched the SD card slot? People won’t even be able to physically connect their iPhones to Apple’s flagship laptops without a $25 new cord. Ports aren’t just window dressing to professionals, they’re necessary connections that offer you freedom to plug-and-play with new tools no matter where you’re traveling.
How often do you really need to plug something into your laptop in an age of Airdrop and Dropbox? But if that’s the case why even give consumers four of them on the MacBook Pro? Well, theoretically because the Pro is for “power users.”īut for all of the Final Cut X and Logic power users that will enjoy editing content on the highly-touted new Touch Bar, how many are ultimately creating that content using classic peripherals that won’t be updating to USB-C connections anytime soon? The argument for most users defending the single USB-C port on the new MacBook was one of frequency.
That doesn’t make it any easier for consumers who have loads of devices-many made by Apple-that will now need a dongle to connect to their “professional” computer. This justification by way of superiority might sound a bit unsatisfying to MacBook buyers who had to hear this exact same reasoning when Apple wasted space on the Thunderbolt 2 ports that were ultimately only adopted by a few high-end peripherals, but this time around Apple isn’t the only one leading the USB-C/Thunderbolt 3 revolution so this will likely see a different outcome. This is an important note because while the MacBook Pro ports are compatible with both types, the regular MacBook only interfaces with USB-C. What Apple does have on its side here is that USB-C/Thunderbolt 3 are invariably the future thanks to their more compact design and faster transfer speeds. USB-C and Thunderbolt 3 are different connection standards with the same physical port. With this MacBook Pro, Apple still sees people needing all of these other ports (see slide below), they just don’t seem to care that consumers will need to buy a separate accessory in order to do so. Others, like losing the headphone jack on the new iPhone 7 or ditching the old USB on the new MacBook have created a bit more of an uproar among users that aren’t psyched about needing a dongle on-hand at all times to connect their device to things they need.īut even with the death of the headphone jack, Apple was making a broader declaration that it believed most headphone manufacturers would soon be adopting bluetooth and designing wireless headphones. Most have made a lot of sense, generally when the company was retiring the proprietary standards that it was largely the only one pushing. I just assumed that it would have four, like my 3-year-old not-top-of-the-line MacBook Pro from 2017.Īpple’s failure: not providing nearly enough ports for the very users the MacBook Pro is - by name - targeted to.Complaining about Apple sacrificing existing consumer needs in terms of connection types is getting pretty tiring. To be fully straightforward, there’s definitely a mea culpa here: I didn’t check the machine we were buying for ports. MORE FROM FORBES Hacker Finds Huge Apple Security Hole Apple Pays $100,000 Bug Bounty By John Koetsier
#NEW MAC PRO USB PORTS WINDOWS#
Comparisons with Windows laptops aren’t apples-to-apples, I know, but a sub-$400 Dell Inspiron has the following:
Offering fewer while calling a machine “Pro” is cynical at best, and predatory at worst. It has four USB-C ports, and even with that number, I have to plug in a hub with more connectors - including standard USB, which most peripherals still come with as a default.